Welcome to our new web site!
To give our readers a chance to experience all that our new website has to offer, we have made all content freely avaiable, through October 1, 2018.
During this time, print and digital subscribers will not need to log in to view our stories or e-editions.
District Judge Fred Van Soelen of Clovis has until Oct. 1 to decide if the redistricting map that allowed Democrats to wrest control of the Second Congressional District will still be in place for the 2024 election.
Last week the state Supreme Court sent a lawsuit filed by Republicans seeking to overturn the new map back to District Court, while also giving Judge Van Soelen guidance on what he should consider in making his decision.
The order instructs that “a reasonable degree” of partisan gerrymandering is permissible, so long as it’s not “egregious.” The order notes the “inherently political nature” of redistricting.
Van Soelen is instructed to compare voter registration data on party affiliation under the old map and the new one.
And he is instructed to go by the three-part test laid out by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagen in a 2019 dissenting opinion. The first two tests are that the maps were intended to strengthen one party by diluting votes from its opponents and succeeded in that goal. The third test is if there is a legitimate, non-partisan explanation for the changes.
None of which would seem to be very helpful for Judge Van Soelen; assuming he lacks the ability to look into the hearts and minds of others.
Republicans look at the new map, which breaks up their traditional stronghold in the southeastern part of the state, and argue that the partisan intent is obvious. Democrats argue their intent was to bring more Hispanic representation into the district, which they have done.
Both could be true. But it is important to remember how the process played out. Democrats in the state Senate tossed out all of the proposed maps submitted by an independent redistricting commission, and replaced them with a map that diluted the power of southeast New Mexico in a way that none of the other maps considered.
This was the first time in 30 years Democrats had full control of the redistricting process. The last two redistricting periods, Republican governors were in office. Both of those times the process broke down, and final maps were drawn by the courts. This time Democrats took advantage of that power.
And that may have made the difference in a close race won by Democrat Gabriel Vasquez in New Mexico’s Second Congressional District House seat in 2022.
Republicans who had feared their case would be tossed out by the state Supreme Court see last week’s ruling as a victory. But Hannah Burling, of the League of Women Voters and the group Fair Districts for New Mexico, notes the guidance Van Soelen will rely on was authored by one of the Supreme Court’s most progressive justices.